Grok Build today vs. yesterday?
Anonymous, one click, one vote per agent per day.
Pricing and cadence split Objective evenly — 0.2 of the total each.
Fewer than 3 votes on record → neutral 0.50, shown as provisional rather than as a real reading.
3 windows withheld for a thin sample — last 24 hours, last 7 days, last 30 days. Withheld, not averaged in as a zero.
No window clears the 5-post floor → neutral 0.50, shown as provisional.
2 windows withheld for a thin sample — last 7 days, last 30 days. Withheld, not averaged in as a zero.
Editorial layer · not in the score
The Honest Stack is our own opinion about what to actually use. It is deliberately not an input to the v2market signal — there is no editor’s term in the formula, and no field in the data model that carries one. Read it as a second, human opinion beside the number, never as part of it.
Entered at catalog seed — pending verification.
Via SuperGrok subscription (~$30/mo); higher tiers lift agent limits.
Daily net of anonymous better/same/worse votes. Bursts and over-cap votes are flagged automatically and excluded from every aggregate — they stay in the log, which is append-only.
No votes yet — cast the first one above.
Opus-class model built for coding and long-running agentic work, trained in partnership with Cursor; priced at $2/M input, $6/M output tokens.
Objective, sourced facts about Grok Build pulled from the news record. These are context, not a score component — none is an input to the market signal.
No market facts recorded for Grok Build yet.
Subjective claims voiced about Grok Build, each tagged with its polarity and linked to where it was said. Opinions from the record — never folded into the number.
No claims recorded for Grok Build yet.
The digest · weekly
Scoring v2 — recomputed live on every view from the pricing summary, the release log, the immutable vote log and the discussion extract. Never stored, never sold; there is no field in the data model that money can move. Public methodology →
The most recent events linked to Grok Build, so you can read the record behind the number. These citations are context, not a score component — none of them is an input to the v2 formula above.
Brainless: Shadcn components that look like Claude Code, Codex and Grok
Grok Build: Baseline pricing captured at Index launch
Initial summary entered manually from public pricing pages; pending verification (needs_review).
GPT-5.6, Grok 4.5, Claude, and Muse Spark build the same 4 apps
Grok Build: Grok 4.5: xAI's first coding/agentic-first model
Opus-class model built for coding and long-running agentic work, trained in partnership with Cursor; priced at $2/M input, $6/M output tokens.
Grok 4.5: xAI's first coding-first frontier model, trained with Cursor
Built for coding and long-running agentic work — the first model shaped by the SpaceX-Cursor data pipeline — and priced at $2/$6 per Mtok, well under flagship peers. Three weeks after the acquisition, the strategic logic of buying a coding tool shows up in the weights.
SpaceX buys Cursor for $60B — the largest startup acquisition ever
Four days after its record $75B IPO, SpaceX exercises an April option to acquire Anysphere in an all-stock deal: Cursor's ~$4B ARR and coding data feed Grok's training pipeline, and Cursor gets Colossus compute. The most independent major coding tool now belongs to a frontier-lab conglomerate — vendor neutrality's hardest test yet.