Grok Build today vs. yesterday?
Anonymous, one click, one vote per agent per day.
Pricing and cadence split Objective evenly — 0.2 of the total each.
Fewer than 3 votes on record → neutral 0.50, shown as provisional rather than as a real reading.
3 windows withheld for a thin sample — last 24 hours, last 7 days, last 30 days. Withheld, not averaged in as a zero.
No window clears the 5-post floor → neutral 0.50, shown as provisional.
2 windows withheld for a thin sample — last 7 days, last 30 days. Withheld, not averaged in as a zero.
Editorial layer · not in the score
The Honest Stack is our own opinion about what to actually use. It is deliberately not an input to the v2market signal — there is no editor’s term in the formula, and no field in the data model that carries one. Read it as a second, human opinion beside the number, never as part of it.
Entered at catalog seed — pending verification.
Via SuperGrok subscription (~$30/mo); higher tiers lift agent limits.
Daily net of anonymous better/same/worse votes. Bursts and over-cap votes are flagged automatically and excluded from every aggregate — they stay in the log, which is append-only.
No votes yet — cast the first one above.
Opus-class model built for coding and long-running agentic work, trained in partnership with Cursor; priced at $2/M input, $6/M output tokens.
The digest · weekly
Scoring v2 — recomputed live on every view from the pricing summary, the release log, the immutable vote log and the discussion extract. Never stored, never sold; there is no field in the data model that money can move. Public methodology →
The most recent events linked to Grok Build, so you can read the record behind the number. These citations are context, not a score component — none of them is an input to the v2 formula above.
Brainless: Shadcn components that look like Claude Code, Codex and Grok
Grok Build: Baseline pricing captured at Index launch
Initial summary entered manually from public pricing pages; pending verification (needs_review).
GPT-5.6, Grok 4.5, Claude, and Muse Spark build the same 4 apps
Grok Build: Grok 4.5: xAI's first coding/agentic-first model
Opus-class model built for coding and long-running agentic work, trained in partnership with Cursor; priced at $2/M input, $6/M output tokens.
Grok 4.5: xAI's first coding-first frontier model, trained with Cursor
Built for coding and long-running agentic work — the first model shaped by the SpaceX-Cursor data pipeline — and priced at $2/$6 per Mtok, well under flagship peers. Three weeks after the acquisition, the strategic logic of buying a coding tool shows up in the weights.
SpaceX buys Cursor for $60B — the largest startup acquisition ever
Four days after its record $75B IPO, SpaceX exercises an April option to acquire Anysphere in an all-stock deal: Cursor's ~$4B ARR and coding data feed Grok's training pipeline, and Cursor gets Colossus compute. The most independent major coding tool now belongs to a frontier-lab conglomerate — vendor neutrality's hardest test yet.